You can keep saying that, but it doesn’t make it true. Your initial statement was that almost no soy is fed directly to animals. If the oil was removed, the animals would not get the full nutrition from it that they need. You continue to demonstrate your arrogant lack of understand of understanding of the subject.
How do you interpret “soybeans processed to soy cakes FOR FEED” as industrial waste. They are processed for digestibility, not as waste.
You are responding to my comments multiple times, for no reason, which to me is combative. I’m just giving back what I’m getting.
Yes, so 76% of soy is fed to livestock. What part of that aren’t you getting?
Or you could actually provide the study that proves it?
The fact that you have a giant combative disclaimer on your profile about what you do and don’t tolerate in discussions tells me all I need to know about you. Call it stalking if you like, but it doesn’t make you right.
Yes, you have a lot of terrible points, it’s no surprise people like to dig into your history to see what other shitty points you have made.
I would love to see what study you have that shows that only 7% of global soy goes to cattle. Any research I have seen says that 70-80% goes to animal feed. Yes it may be processed for oils but that does not mean that it is not a protein source that is going to animals, when it could be going to humans.
Almost no soy goes to cattle is one of the most fallacious statements I have ever read.
Lol, ok, sure