• 0 Posts
  • 3 Comments
Joined 7 months ago
cake
Cake day: July 4th, 2025

help-circle
  • The pattern of demoing stuff like this and then responding to the glaring issues and failures with, “but just wait until the next model bro, eventually this will work bro, just need a larger context window, maybe some recursive prompting, we’re basically already there bro,” is so embarrassing. If I claimed to have written this myself and presented it at a tech conference (or hell, even turned it in as an assignment in a CS course), I’d be laughed out of the room when it failed to compile hello world. The fact that people see this and get excited is so bizarre.

    If it can’t compile hello world, can you even imagine all the easily exploitable security issues, the unhandled edge cases, the major performance issues, etc. that are buried in that dumpster fire of source code. That this is what passes for software “engineering” now is so sad. Too bad they don’t start using this compiler at Anthropic.



  • I am staunchly anti-AI, but the company I am working for unfortunately pushes AI tool adoption extremely aggressively. A lot of the things in the post are similar to sentiments I have. Specifically the sections around vibe coding offloading the burden of work to the reviewer and how to mitigate that by pushing back against those sorts of PRs.

    I agree with you, though, that the post ignores the simplest solution of just not using AI tools. It may be the case that the author doesn’t have the ability to enforce that, but it should still definitely be listed as the first and most logical solution.

    I’m at the point where I’m seriously considering creating a blocklist of certain engineers at work that spam out vibe coded trash PRs and informing my manager that I will not do code reviews for anyone on the list.