• coyootje@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          15 days ago

          The difference is that Europe should be more capable of resisting America. We’ll see if that actually happens but given how things have gone before when the EU went after American companies I don’t think they’ll budge easily.

          • Plastic_Ramses@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            15 days ago

            Not when combined with “completely unrelated” tarrifs and psyops from china and russia.

            10 years until europe falls.

  • magnetosphere@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    15 days ago

    Not even in office yet, and already making threats.

    I’d like to see Europe tell Vance to fuck off. I suspect that if Europe gives in now, the Trump administration will make this same threat every time Europe does something he doesn’t like.

    Trump will be an unreliable NATO ally anyway, so it isn’t much of a risk on Europe’s part.

    • OpenStars@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      15 days ago

      And this was from September so not even elected yet.

      Tbh it kinda sounds like they just want to leave NATO regardless.

      • magnetosphere@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        15 days ago

        I get the same feeling, too. They’re just looking for an excuse to ditch Europe - perhaps as a sacrifice to Putin.

      • Blackmist@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        15 days ago

        I’d be amazed if he does any of it tbh. Last time he just spent most of it playing golf, and sticking his goofy-ass signature on anything they stick in front of him.

        The last thing they want to do is actually deal with the boogeyman issues. If they did that they’ll have nothing to campaign on next time.

        Most of this will be spent lining their own pockets.

        • kobra@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          15 days ago

          This is such an optimistic take. I am very concerned they will spend the next 4 years making sure whatever election we have next is more similar to a Russian “election”.

          • nomous@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            15 days ago

            Why wouldn’t they try? They’ve done everything they could so far and face no repercussions, why not go ahead and try to be king? A few people will fret and tut-tut but if nobody is going to do anything it doesn’t amount to much.

  • Jesus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    15 days ago

    These autocrats have always wanted to drop NATO.

    Let’s not pretend like X is their reason. Supporting autocracy is their reason, and now they’re trying to come up with excuses to get the public onboard.

      • perestroika@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        15 days ago

        So, NATO had a problematic operation, trying to establish (and coordinate the establishment of) guerilla stay-behind troops to use in the event of Soviet takeover - and the operation went especially problematic in Italy during the Years of Lead, where some of those guys associated with right-wing terrorists. The year was 1969 or so.

        Basing on this, how do I conclude anything about the NATO of today?

        Disclaimer: I was asked to hold an anti NATO speech during a protest event during a NATO summit. Being a moderately honest anarchist, I held a speech denouncing the practises seen in Afghanistan (the year was 2012), but emphasized that collective self defense is a valuable thing to have (a common attitude here in Eastern Europe), and added that if the alliance would bother doing what it says on the sticker, I would support it.

        NATO is an alliance of various countries. Some of them aren’t nice or democratic (classic example: Turkey). Mixed bag, and constantly changing. Membership in NATO is not a letter of indulgence for a member state to do anything - allies are obliged to help only if someone attacks a member state. If a NATO member attacks someone else, allies can ignore the affair or even oppose the member (example: Turkey recently bombed Kurdish troops in Syria so sloppily that threatened US troops shot down a Turkish drone).

        • index@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          15 days ago

          “According to several Western European researchers, the operation involved the use of assassination, psychological warfare, and false flag operations to delegitimize left-wing parties in Western European countries, and even went so far as to support anti-communist militias and right-wing terrorism as they tortured communists and assassinated them, such as Eduardo Mondlane in 1969”

          Based on this conclude what you want about the NATO of today.

          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steadfast_Defender_2024

      • sardaukar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        15 days ago

        You wanting the same thing JD Vance wants should trigger a warning in your brain before you say anything else.

  • maplebar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 days ago

    Holding Western stability hostage in the name of the oligarchs, good job voting everyone…