• Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Great, another article with a misleading headline, and when you read the article the crucial bit is in the last line, where its mentioned its likely an accidental discharge.

    Seems like other news sources are mentioning this more explicitly.

    Still shouldnt be waving guns around, or have them at all IMO, but thats no excuse for the poor framing of the article by the author.

    Edit: I get it, we call them negligent discharges now. Doesnt change my point. This is not a random fit of murderous rage, its a mishandled firearm.

    Can’t talk about how dangerous guns are though right.

    • teft@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Accidental discharges don’t exist. They are called negligent discharges because guns don’t fire accidentally.

      • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Okay sure, I’ll try and remember the new term. The guy did still fuck up but he didnt get out in a homicidal rage and shoot someone in the face before even saying a word.

        This is someone mishandling a gun who should know better because of their standing in the community, and I think a short prison term wouldnt be crazy for this.

        • teft@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          You only point guns at things you want to destroy. This was completely avoidable. I knew guys kicked out of the army for negligent discharges that didn’t hit anything. Hitting someone in the face should be a lengthy prison term.

          • Uriel238 [all pronouns]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            This [is what] I was taught handling firearms in the eighties. So imagine my surprise and distress seeing the police lines during the Ferguson unrest standing or walking with their guns pointed at the crowd. One unintended discharge by law enforcement could have been disaster.

            We’ve gone batshit bizarro regarding guns in the US.

            • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              Thank you, thats the point I’m making. Not defending the councilman, pointing out how dangerous guns are in american culture and how easy they are to acquire.

      • …guns dont fire accidentally

        Oh yes they do, and its a contingency in any theater of war. New guns are required to be safer but old guns that are less safe still exist and are in use. I was raised shooting guns well older than I was…or am.

        And they can misfire which often means clearing a cartridge that might still go off. Fun times.

        • theneverfox@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          They can definitely misfire, but humans are more likely to misfire

          When the adrenaline is pumping, it’s real easy to squeeze slightly harder… That’s why your finger shouldn’t be on the trigger until you’re ready to shoot

          You want to tell me your gun shot two rounds instead of one? I can believe that. You want to tell me a cold gun, with a round in the chamber for more than 5 seconds, suddenly decided to override the required mechanical safety because you waved it around?